阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中,选出最佳选项。
One evening in February 2007, a student
named Paula Ceely brought her car to a stop on a remote road in Wales. She got
out to open a metal gate that blocked her path. That's when she heard the
whistle sounded by the driver of a train. Her Renault Clio was parked across a
railway line. Seconds later, she watched the train drag her car almost a
kilometre down the railway tracks.
Ceely's near miss made the news
because she blamed it on her GPS device. She had never driver the route before.
It was dark and raining heavily. Ceely was relying on her GPS, but it made no
mention of the crossing. "I put my complete trust in the device and it led
me right into the path of a speeding train," she told the BBC.
Who is to blame here? Rick Stevenson, who
tells Ceely's story in his book When Machines Fail Us, points the finger at the
limitations of technology. We put our faith in digital devices, he says, but
our digital helpers are too often not up to the job. They are filled with small
problems. And it's not just GPS devices: Stevenson takes us on a tour of
digital disasters involving everything from mobile phones to wireless keyboards.
The problem with his argument in the book
is that it's not clear why he only focuses on digital technology, while there
may be a number of other possible causes. A map-maker might have left the
crossing off a paper map. Maybe we should blame Ceely for not paying attention.
Perhaps the railway authorities are at fault for poor signaling system. Or
maybe someone has studied the relative dangers and worked out that there really
is something specific wrong with the GPS equipment. But Stevenson doesn't say.
It's a problem that runs through the book. In
a section on cars, Stevenson gives an account of the advanced techniques that
criminals use to defeat computer-based locking systems for cars. He offers two
independent sets of figures on car theft; both show a small rise in some parts
of the country. He says that once again not all new locks have proved reliable,
Perhaps, but maybe it's also due to the shortage of policemen on the streets. Or
changing social circumstances. Or some combination of these factors.
The game between humans and their smart
devices is amusing and complex. It is shaped by economics and psychology and
the cultures we live in. Somewhere in the mix of those forces there may be a
way for a wiser use of technology.
If there is such a way, it should involve
more than just an awareness of the shortcomings of our machines. After all, we
have lived with them for thousands of years. They have probably been fooling us
for just a. s long.