题型:任务型阅读 题类:模拟题 难易度:普通
上海市2020届高考英语二模测试卷(A卷)
A. Coral reefs are threatened well beyond coastal areas. B. It won't happen immediately but it will be death by 1,000 blows. C. The reefs are likely to be among the first ecosystems to be wiped out by the climate crisis. D. It upgraded risk assessments for coral reefs following faster-than-expected global bleaching. E. The consequences include more than losing one of the most beautiful and bio-diverse habitats on the planet. F. Most available evidence suggests that coral dominated ecosystems will be non-existent at this temperature or higher. |
Children born today may be the last generation to see coral reefs in all their glory. That's a warning from a marine biologist who is coordinating efforts to monitor the decline of the world's most colorful ecosystem.
Global heating and ocean acidification(酸化) have already taken a heavy toll on the world's coral reefs. Some 16 to 33 percent of all warm-water reefs have been severely bleached(漂白), and the remaining reefs are vulnerable to even a fraction of a degree more warming, said the marine biologist, David Obura. He chairs the Coral Specialist Group in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
"It will be like lots of lights blinking off," he told the Observer. " Between now and 2 degrees Celsius, we will see more reefs dropping off the map."
Today's reefs have a history going back 25 million to 50 million years. They have survived collisions between the Earth's tectonic plates(地壳板块), such as that of Africa into Europe, and India into Asia. Yet in five decades, Obura said, mankind has undermined the global climate so fundamentally that the globally connected reef system could be lost in the next generation.
The warning follows a landmark UN climate report. Scientists warned that if warming reached 2℃, which now appears very likely in the next 50 years, there would be a more than 99% chance that tropical coral reefs would be wiped out.
The UN report also warned of severe knock-on impacts to fisheries and millions of people living in coastal communities, who will lose vital sources of income and be less protected from storms.
Coral reefs are often described as undersea forests, but they are declining far more quickly than the Amazon rainforests. A temperature rise of just 1 to 2 degrees Celsius can cause the algae(藻类) upon which corals(珊瑚虫) depend to leave. That would drain the coral reefs of colour and make the structure more easily broken. These bleaching events can be temporary if waters cool, but the more frequent they are and the longer they last, the greater the risk of irreparable damage.
There are good reasons to value our friendships.Some years ago a public-opinion research firm,Roper Starch Worldwide,asked 2007 people to name one or two things that said the most about themselves.Friends far outranked homes jobs, clothes and cars.
“Ironically,” says Brant R.Burleson, professor of communication at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., “the better friends you are, the more likely you'll face conflicts.” And the outcome can be what you don't want—an end to the relationship.
The good news is that most troubled friendships can be mended.
Swallow your pride. It wasn't easy, but that's what Denise Moreland of Hickam Air Force Base in Hawaii did when a friendship turned sour.For nearly four months,Moreland,45,had watched over Nora Huizenga's two young daughters, who were living with their father on the base,while Huizenga,40,completed training as a dental hygienist in Nevada.“I felt honored to be asked to step in,” Moreland says.
“When Huizenga returned at Christmas,” Moreland recalls,“I had so much to tell her, but she never called.”
One daughter had a birthday party, but Moreland wasn't invited. “I felt like I'd been used,” she says.At first, Moreland swore to avoid Huizenga.Then she decided to swallow her pride and let her friend know how she felt. Huizenga admitted that she'd been so worried about being separated from her family that she'd been blind to what her friend had done to help her. Today she says, “I would never have figured out what happened if Denise hadn't called me on it.”
When a friend hurts you, your instinct is to protect yourself.But that makes it harder to solve problems,explains William Wilmot,author of Relational Communication.“Most of us are relieved when differences are brought out in the open.”
Apologize when you're wrong—even if you've also been wronged.But over the course of a friendship, even the best people make mistakes. “We don't think clearly when we're arguing,” says Michael Lang,a professional mediator (调解人) in Pittsburgh. Instead, says Lang, ask: “What's going on? This doesn't make sense.”
See things from your friend's point of view. Sociologists Rebecca Adams Rosemary and Blieszner interviewed 53 adults who each had many friendships lasting decades. “We were curious how these people managed to sustain strong friendships for so long,” says Blieszner. Tolerance is key, the researchers learned.” It's surprising how often a dispute results from a simple misunderstanding,” adds psychotherapist Anne Frenkel.
Accept that friendships change. “Friendships change as our needs and lifestyles change,” Wilmot observes.
Making friends can sometimes seem easy,says Yager.The hard part is keeping the connections strong during the natural ups and downs that affect all relationships.Her suggestion: Consider friendship an honor and a gift,and worth the effort to treasure and nurture.
Title: Keep on your friendships | ||
Our friendships should be {#blank#}1{#/blank#} | According to a survey, friends are more {#blank#}2{#/blank#} than other things like homes,jobs and cars.However ,the better friends you are, the more {#blank#}3{#/blank#} you may face more conflicts. | |
{#blank#}4{#/blank#} to mend a broken friendship | Swallow your pride | When a friendship is damaged,it only makes things worse to escape from reality.Instead,we should lay down our self-esteem and {#blank#}5{#/blank#} our feelings straight forwardly to our friends. |
Make an apology when you are mistaken | We should {#blank#}6{#/blank#} arguing since it makes no sense at all. | |
{#blank#}7{#/blank#} differences | We'd better learn to put ourselves in our friends' shoes. In many cases, a simple misunderstanding can {#blank#}8{#/blank#} to disputes. | |
Accept the change of friendships | We should be {#blank#}9{#/blank#} of the fact that friendships change as our needs and lifestyles change. | |
Conclusion | Friendship is an honor and a gift, and it is worthwhile {#blank#}10{#/blank#} efforts to cherish and nurture. |
注意:每空一词。
A recent study points out a so-called “gender-equality paradox(性别平等悖论)”: there are more women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) in countries with lower gender equality. Why do women make up 40 percent of engineering majors in Jordan, but only 34 percent in Sweden and 19 percent in the U.S.? The researchers suggest that women are just less interested in STEM, and when liberal Western countries let them choose freely, they freely choose different fields.
We disagree.
From cradle to classroom, a wealth of research shows that the environment has a major influence on girls' interest and ability in math and science. Early in school, teachers, unconscious prejudice push girls away from STEM. By their preteen years, girls outperform boys in science class and report equal interest in the subject, but parents think that science is harder and less interesting for their daughters than their sons, and these misunderstandings predict their children's career choices.
Later in life, women get less credit than men for the same math performance. When female STEM majors write to potential PhD advisors, they are less likely to get a response. When STEM professors review applications for research positions, they are less likely to hire “Jennifer” than “John,” even when both applications are otherwise identical—and if they do hire “Jennifer,” they pay her $4,000 less.
These findings make it clear that women in Western countries are not freely expressing their lack of “interest” in STEM. In fact, cultural attitudes and discrimination are shaping women's interests in a way that is anything but free, even in otherwise free countries.
“Gender-equality paradox” research misses those social factors because it relies on a broad measure of equality called the Gender Gap Index (GGI), which tracks indicators such as wage difference, government representation and health outcomes. These are important markers of progress, but if we want to explain something as complicated as gender representation in STEM, we have to look into people's heads.
Fortunately, we have ways to do that. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a well-validated tool for measuring how tightly two concepts are tied together in people's minds. The psychologist Brian Nosek and his colleagues analyzed over 500,000 responses to a version of the IAT that measures mental associations between men/women and science, and compared results from 34 countries. Across the world, people associated science more strongly with men than with women.
But surprisingly, these gendered associations were stronger in supposedly egalitarian (主张平等的) Sweden than they were in the U.S., and the most pro-female scores came from Jordan. We re-analyzed the study's data and found that the GGI's assessment of overall gender equality of a country has nothing to do with that country's scores on the science IAT.
That means the GGI fails to account for cultural attitudes toward women in science and the complicated mix of history and culture that forms those attitudes.
Comparison | A recent study | The author's idea |
Opinions | “Gender-equality paradox” {#blank#}1{#/blank#} from the personal reason that women are less interested in STEM. | The environment including cultural attitudes and discrimination is {#blank#}2{#/blank#} women's interests. |
Facts | {#blank#}3{#/blank#} with Jordan and Sweden, America had the least percentage of women majoring in engineering. | • Early in school: Girls perform {#blank#}4{#/blank#} than boys in science. • Later in life: Female STEM majors are more likely to be {#blank#}5{#/blank#} by potential PhD advisors. |
Tools | It is {#blank#}6{#/blank#} on GGI. | IAT {#blank#}7{#/blank#} how tightly two concepts are tied together in people's minds. |
Findings | Women in liberal Western countries tend to {#blank#}8{#/blank#} STEM. | • The GGFs assessment of overall gender equality is not {#blank#}9{#/blank#} to that country's scores on the science IAT. • The GGI can't {#blank#}10{#/blank#} people's cultural attitudes towards women in science, which are formed by a mix of history and culture. |
注意:每个空格只填1个单词。
We all need to feel understood, recognized and affirmed by our friends, family and romantic partners. We all need to find our tribe.
Research has shown that among the benefits that come with being in a relationship or group, feeling accepted is regarded as the most important driver of meaning. When other people think you matter and treat you as if you matter, you believe you matter, too.
Though we all share a need to belong, in the first decades of the 20th century, many influential psychologists and physicians did not acknowledge this fundamental aspect of human nature. The idea that children needed parental love and care to live a full and meaningful life was not only considered medically dangerous, but also dismissed as immoral and disgusting.
As behavioral psychology came into fashion and academic psychologists turned their attention to child- raising, this view shifted and they began to examine and affirm the vital importance of attachment in early life. They discovered that people, whatever their age, needed more than food and shelter to live full and healthy lives.
But, sadly, many of us lack close ties. At a time when we are more connected digitally than ever before, rates of social isolation are rising. The results of an Age UK poll published recently suggest that half a million people over the age of 60 usually spend each day alone, and it's not unusual for another half a million people to go without someone to speak to for five or six days. All these figures reveal more than a rise in loneliness — they reveal a lack of meaning in people's lives. In surveys, we list our close relationships as our most important sources of meaning. Research shows that people who are lonely and isolated feel their lives are less meaningful.
While close relationships are critical for living a meaningful life, they are not the only important social bonds we need to cultivate. Psychologists have also discovered the value of small moments of intimacy. “High-quality connections”, as one researcher calls them, are positive, short-term interactions between two people when a couple holds hands on a walk or when two strangers have an empathetic(移情作用的) conversation on a plane. High-quality connections have the potential to unlock meaning in our interactions with acquaintances, colleagues and strangers. We can't control whether someone will make a high-quality connection with us, but we can all choose to start one. We can say hello to a stranger on the street rather than look away. We can choose to value people rather than devalue them. We can invite people to belong.
Passage outline |
Supporting details |
The need to belong |
*Everyone hopes to develop a {#blank#}1{#/blank#} of belonging in a group. *People's self-respect is {#blank#}2{#/blank#} by other people's opinion. |
The changing {#blank#}3{#/blank#} to belonging |
*Many famous experts in the first decades of the 20th century {#blank#}4{#/blank#} that people had the need to belong. *Experts later came to realize that people, {#blank#}5{#/blank#} of their age, needed attachment to enjoy full and healthy lives. |
Consequences of {#blank#}6{#/blank#} close ties |
*Many people are cut off from the world and feel {#blank#}7{#/blank#}. *People who do not have enough close relationships find their lives are less {#blank#}8{#/blank#}. |
Another way to meet the need |
*High-quality connections make a {#blank#}9{#/blank#} in helping satisfy our need to belong. *We should {#blank#}10{#/blank#} to make a high-quality connection. |
试题篮