阅读理解
According to official government figures,
there are more than twice as many kangaroos as people in Australia, and many
Australians consider them pests(有害动物). Landholding farmers say
that the country's estimated 50 million kangaroos damage their crops and compete
with livestock for scarce resources. Australia's insurance industry says that
kangaroos are involved in more than 80 percent of the 20,000-plus
vehicle-animal collisions reported each year. In the country's underpopulated
region, the common belief is that kangaroo numbers have swollen to “plague
proportions."
In the absence of traditional hunters, the
thinking goes, killing kangaroos is critical to balancing the ecology and
boosting the rural economy. A government-sanctioned(政府认可的) industry, based on the commercial harvest of kangaroo meat and
hides, exported $29 million in products in 2017 and supports about 4,000 jobs.
Today meat, hides, and leather from kangaroos have been exported to 56
countries. Global brands such as Nike, Puma, and Adidas buy strong, supple
“k-leather" to make athletic gear. And kangaroo meat is finding its way
into more and more grocery stores.
Advocates point out that low-fat, high-protein
kangaroo meat comes from an animal more environmentally friendly than greenhouse
gas-emitting sheep and cattle. John Kelly, former executive director of the
Kangaroo Industry Association of Australia, says, “Harvesting our food and
fibers from animals adapted to Australia's fragile rangelands is extremely wise
and sustainable. Many ecologists will tell you that there is no more humane way
of producing red meat."
Opponents(反对者) of the industry call the
killing inhumane, unsustainable, and unnecessary. Population estimates are
highly debatable, they say, but “plague proportions" are biologically implausible.
Little kangaroos grow slowly, and many die, so kangaroo populations can expand
by only 10 to 15 percent a year, and then only under the best of circumstances.
Dwayne Bannon-Harrison, a member of the Yuin people of New South Wales, says
the idea that kangaroos are destroying the country is laughable. “They've been
walking this land a lot longer than people have," he says. “How could
something that's been here for thousands of years be 'destroying' the country?
I don't understand the logic in that."
Can Australians' conflicting attitudes toward
kangaroos be reconciled(和解)? George Wilson says that
if kangaroos were privately owned, then graziers(放牧人)—working independently or
through wildlife conservancies—would protect the animals, treating them as
possessions. They could feed them, lease them, breed them and charge hunter a
fee for access. “If you want to conserve something," Wilson says, “you
have to give it a value. Animals that are considered pests don't have value."
Privatization could also help reduce grazing
pressures. If kangaroos were more valuable than cattle or sheep, farmers would
keep less live-stock, which could be good for the environment. Under this
scheme, landholders would work with the kangaroo industry on branding,
marketing and quality control. The government's role would be oversight and
regulation.