阅读理解
The
urgency and importance of Covid-19 over (he past year have driven almost
everything else from most leaders5 minds. But since the vaccine is kicking in,
Britain's government is once again beginning to think about the things that
will matter later. Next week, it is expected to publish a 'plan for growth"
to boost productivity, with innovation at its centre.
The
world may be on the point of a technological boom with life sciences, at which
Britain excels. Innovation is crucial to productivity, but on this front
Britain's performance has lagged behind its competitors' in recent years. Its
low spending on Research and Development (R&D) argues for a boost. Those
who attributed the financial failure in the 1970s to the insufficiency of
research funds may regard this as a threat to economic growth. Promoting
innovation can quickly (um into an exercise in picking winners - or, as is more
often the case, losers.
A
second danger is that policy agendas get mixed up. The government has promised
to "level up" poorer areas of the country, so deprived towns arc
campaigning for more money for their universities. But trying to boost
innovation by sending money to weak institutions is likely to make our leading
universities lose their advantages, thus producing average ideas that could
have been remarkable. Britain's research-funding system has always been
elitist(精英主义的). It should stay that
way.
The
government's first move in boosting innovation was the announcement of a plan
for an Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). ARlA's purpose is to fund
high-risk, high-reward research. But money is not all that mailers. The
successful translation of life science research into treatments during the
pandemic suggests some inexpensive measures that can also make a difference.
One
is to speed up governmental processes. The rapidity with which Britain's
medical regulator moved during the pandemic is one reason why the vaccine
rollout is racing through the population. Urgency is not unique lo pandemics.
Getting things done quickly can make an investment worthwhile and determine
where a businessman chooses as a base.
Another
useful measure the government should use is its unique ability to overcome
barriers. At the beginning of the pandemic. Covid-19 researchers were unable to
gain access to different strands of health service data. The government eased
restrictions on existing data and allowed researchers to ask people who had
tested positive tor Covid-19 to join trials. Both were crucial to the effort.
A
last principle is the value of connections between the government and the
private sector. Kate Bingham, a venture capitalist who led the vaccine-purchase
effort, understood how to deal with drug companies. Many of the civil servants
working with her had commercial experience. The governments closeness to
business during the pandemic has been criticized. But without it, the vaccine
effort would not have succeeded.
Innovation
took human beings from caves to computers. Good education, a welcoming
immigration policy and a friendly business environment will do most to tend it.
But a new sensible principles can help keep the flame burning.