试题

试题 试卷

logo

题型:阅读选择 题类:常考题 难易度:普通

牛津版(深圳•广州)2019-2020学年初中英语八年级上册Module 2 Unit 4 Invention第3课时 Grammar

阅读理解

    Can you imagine a pair of shoes that could tie themselves? All you have to do is put them on and push a button. Well, this idea is becoming a reality. The shoe company Nike created the self-tying shoe! This idea first came from the film Back to the Future II, Nike has been working for years to create a shoe that can do this in real life. They have finally done it with Nike HyperAdapt 1.0.

    So how does it work? According to Nike, the shoe is “powered by an underfoot-lacing mechanism(脚下系带装置) small motor that has the power to lace the shoes, All you have to do is put them on, and at first, the shoes are very loose(松的). But then you can push the "+" perfect fit for you. To take them off, all you have to do is push the "-" button, and the shoes will be easily off.

    They haven't been widely released to the public yet, and the price of the shoes is quite high.

(1)、The best title to describe the main idea of the passage is "__________"
A、Shoes of the future are now a reality B、Shoes of the future are coming themselves C、The shoe company Nike and its film D、Shoes and films are doing their work
(2)、When did the shoe company Nike start creating the self-tying shoe?
A、Not until the imagination came into being. B、Soon after the shoe company Nike was formed. C、After the film Back to the Future Ⅱ was shown. D、Before the film Back to the Future Ⅱ was formed.
(3)、What makes the self-tying shoe work?
A、The power from Nike. B、An underfoot-lacing mechanism. C、Nike HyperAdaPt 1.0 D、Setting a small button with a motor.
(4)、The first thing for the wearer to do after putting the shoes on is __________.
A、make them loose B、make the perfect fit C、push the "-" botton D、push the "+" botton
举一反三
阅读理解

    It took 13 years of international effort to map the human biological blueprint of all the genes (基因) that make us different people. The first rough draft (草图) made in 2000. The last of our 23 chromosomes (染色体) was clearly described in 2006. Ever since then, the age of personal genetic testing has been upon us. Since that time, a growing number of private companies have come on the market mostly through the Internet, offering to scan your personal DNA and compare it to some disease markets of the blueprint, called DTC genetic tests.

    But over the last five years the medical world has been discussing excitedly about whether these DTC tests are helpful or harmful, scientifically believable or completely useless. One of the usual criticisms (批评) is that the science is so new that no one really knows yet how to explain the information.

    "At present they largely remain in the period of research studies," notes Dr. Greg Ferro, special advisor to the director of genomic medicine at the US National Human Genome Research Institute. Ferro says there are two reasons." The first is that when they offer a test, are they really checking what they should check? And then the next is that even if it is believable, does what the test is checking really mean anything to your health?"

    Other worries include the privacy of the results and how your personal genetic information might be used by insurance (保险) companies to refuse your insurance or your boss to dismiss you. Or you could learn information with a huge social or personal impact (冲击), such as finding out that genetically you cannot possibly be the father of your child. It can also give you risks that may break your life, such as whether you are at high risk of cancer, Parkinson or other terrible diseases.

    Criticisms over the tests are such that some countries, such as Germany, have banned them. In 2011, some scientists advised the US government that most tests should be done under the guidance of medical professionals (专家). The UK government also expressed its worries about DTC genetic tests and in August 2010 made a set of rules to guide the development of genetic tests.

    In 2011, three medical researchers published a review article in the International Journal of Clinical Practice, saying that such tests offered more risks than benefits. The most important reason is that the tests might create worries or unreal results or drive unnecessary medical treatments. They also noted some of the genetic information the tests are based on at present is far from being perfect.

返回首页

试题篮