As a child, Wang Junyan never dreamed of becoming a famous person on TV. However, she is the presenter for Universe TV news programmes. She told me that{#blank#}1{#/blank#}, working hard and believing in what was true made her success. Her mother was a strong character. She worked extremely hard{#blank#}2{#/blank#}through school. Her attitude towards life will never stop influencing her thoughts and actions. After graduating from university, Junyan chose to be a journalist to help the people and the government{#blank#}3{#/blank#}and catch the guilty people. It wasn't easy but she never gave up. This{#blank#}4{#/blank#}because she won an award for her report. When asked about her secret to success,{#blank#}5{#/blank#}she told us, “Nothing that I learned from my mother has ever left me. Today when I'm looking for stories, I still feel like I am turning over stones to see what might be hiding beneath!”

    Paper-cutting is a Chinese folk art {#blank#}1{#/blank#} a long history. It {#blank#}2{#/blank#} back to the time of the Northern and Southern Dynasty. By the Southern Song Dynasty, paper-cutting had become an important part of everyday life.

    There are three {#blank#}3{#/blank#} of paper cuts which people still make today. Paper cuts used for {#blank#}4{#/blank#} are often seen on windows and gates. They are usually {#blank#}5{#/blank#} up during holidays to bring good luck. They are also used on presents A present for parents whose child has {#blank#}6{#/blank#} been born might show a paper cut of children, for example. Paper cuts which show the Chinese character for double {#blank#}7{#/blank#} are often used to celebrate weddings.

    Paper cuts used for religious purposes are often found in temples. They are also used {#blank#}8{#/blank#} offerings to the dead People to whom the dead person was {#blank#}9{#/blank#} would make these offerings on special days and during festivals.

    The third kind of paper cuts are those used to make {#blank#}10{#/blank#} on clothing.

    Directions: Complete the following passage by using the words in the box. Each word can only be used once. Note that there is one word more than you need.

    The Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery was preparing the wall text in 2014 to accompany an image of the boxer Mayweather Jr. During the process, the Washington museum decided to note that Mr. Mayweather had been“charged with domestic violence on several occasions,” receiving “punishments ranging from community service to jail time.”

    Such context is common for {#blank#}1{#/blank#} subjects in art, but far less so for artists themselves. Men like Picasso or Schiele were known for mistreating women, but their works hang in {#blank#}2{#/blank#} museums without any asterisks（星号）.

    Now, museums around the world are{#blank#}3{#/blank#} with the implications of a decision, by the National Gallery of Art in Washington, to {#blank#}4{#/blank#} postpone a Chuck Close exhibition because of {#blank#}5{#/blank#} of sexual harassment（骚扰）involving potential portrait models that have involved the artist in controversy. Mr. Cloze has called the allegations “lies” and said he is “being severely criticized.”

    The {#blank#}6{#/blank#} has raised difficult questions about what to do with the paintings and photographs of Mr. close—held by museums like the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, the Tate in London and the Pompidou in Paris, as well as by high-spending collectors—and whether the work of other artists accused of questionable {#blank#}7{#/blank#} needs to be revisited.

    It is a provocative（引起争论的）moment for the art world, as the public debate about {#blank#}8{#/blank#} creative output from personal behavior moves from popular culture into the realm of major visual artists from different eras and the institutions that have long collected and exhibited their pieces.

“We're very used to having to defend people in the collection, but it's always been for the sitter” rather than the artist, said Kim Sajet, director of the Portrait Gallery, which has a large body of Mr. Close's work. “Now we have to think to ourselves, ‘Do we need to do that about Chuck Close?'”

    “You can't talk about portraiture in America without talking about Chuck Close,” she added. “There are lots of amazing artists who have been less than admirable people.”

    Whatever museums {#blank#}9{#/blank#} decide to do about Mr. Close, some say they can no longer afford to simply present art without {#blank#}10{#/blank#} the issues that surround the artist—that institutions must play a more active role in educating the public about the human beings behind the work.

a.{#blank#}1{#/blank#} from France reached Canada in 1534.

b. They have {#blank#}2{#/blank#}themselves in their new house.

c. In the early days of the {#blank#}3{#/blank#}of Australia, some {#blank#}4{#/blank#}unwisely introduced the European rabbit.